Celebrate Nature (ad)

Celebrate Nature (ad)
(ad)

Quote of the Month

Quote of the Month
March 2024

Publishing Credits: The Writer's "Catch-22" Market

Today I want to cover something that no one in all my writing education has ever covered, until now: Publishing Credits. I cannot believe after learning about this very important topic that none of my professors, instructors, or even other authors have ever even remotely touched on this subject. I believe it's incredibly negligent, to put it far too kindly, as if they don't want us to know the writer's market is actually a catch-22 market. I have many hypotheses as to why this could be, but it doesn't matter because to not inform of us this subject is again horribly negligent. Which again I firmly believe is too kind.  

My current instructor likened it to getting your first credit card. You need to establish a form of credit before you can get a credit card, but how can you possibly gain any sense of credit without having one? I was fortunate in that I worked at a place that gave college students their very first credit card without a single bat of the eye. And yes, it was a legit bank and yes it was a legit credit card. You can ask me more about this in the comments below,  because that's the last thing I'll say on the matter as I am digressing ever so slightly. 

In the Writer's "Catch-22" Market, publishers want to work with writers who have been already published, or have what is known as publishing credit. This means your first manuscript, first news-worthy article, your first short story likely won't get even a second glance, let alone a first one if you send it in to a publishing house. That's not to say you shouldn't still try, but should you get a rejection letter, unless the letter specifically states there is something wrong with your manuscript/article/story (etc), the reason for your rejection undoubtedly has more to do with the fact you lack publishing credits.

The best way to receive credit is by entering writing contests since [most] contests do not require you to already have any publishing credit. I currently have never seen a writer's contest that says you must have publishing credit, especially the ones that are judged blindly (meaning your name and information is completely stripped from your submitted work before being passed to the judge/s). Should you win or even gain an honorable mention, boom! You have a publishing credit you can use. 

WARNING: You should not have to pay a fee to enter, unless the prize is really high (like in the thousands), but even then the entrance fee should not be in the double digits. You also should not have anyone tell you "your submission needs a few tweaks our team can work on for this amount". That's an immediate alert you've run into a scam. Never pay a fee to go hear your won submission read or performed either, even if you're the one being requested to read or perform the work. Tickets and expenses should be included in your award. If it is not, SCAM. And you definitely should not have to pay for your work to be sent to you i.e. in an anthology. I've found contests where, if your work will be submitted into an anthology, that very anthology is awarded as a prize rather than a monetary sum, but again you will not have to pay for the anthology to be sent to your house. If you have to pay for it you're being involved in a scam, and you cannot use these as publishing credits or your rep will be severely tarnished—if not ruined completely—before you can even begin gaining credits. 

Check in with Reedsy as they constantly put up writing contests you can use as a publishing credit. Also join Submittable for free. Only pay if you are hoping to create and host your own writing contests. 

While Submittable is bit difficult to use the first time around, especially as they have not-the-best costumer service, it allows you to find writing contests via the "discover" tab. Type in anything you think you'd want to enter (i.e. "Virus Poems" or "Short Story" or "Sci-Fi") and you will receive a list right on the screen of global websites hosting contests. Granted the problem with this source is that not every scam has been weeded out of the list. 

The other problem is you will also receive sites who are hosting open submissions of that very category, meaning if you decide to publish to one these sites you will need publishing credits, but creating your own author website can help do the trick. Post a few articles, short stories, any thing you've written that could be remotely considered credible, and use this as a writing credit. Also LinkedIn articles can be considered a publishing credit, too. Though not as great as being published by an external source seeing as anyone one can publish anything to LinkedIn and you can publish anything to your own digital portfolio, I've learned through massive amounts of research it still counts. But you will want to be somewhat vague about it in your cover/query letter. 

Just in case you need a cover letter or a query letter, for those trying to push "regular" submissions but may not have all the necessary publishing credits, you may refer to my own Beginner's Cover Letter/Query Letter example in the Helpful Tips column of this blog to see how I got away with using my lack of credits to my somewhat advantage. It was a trick of sorts I learned through The Writer's Market 2020 Edition as this year's book features an entire section of query letters for beginners. 

If you have any questions, comments, or would like help putting together your beginner's query letter (no fee), pleas message me in the comments below. 

Thank you!

News of the Day:

I couldn't think of a creative title therefore "News of the Day" will have to suffice. I also don't feel much like writing a long post right now as it's late (midnight my time) and I am very tried, so I'm going to write the rest of this post bullet-point style. 

Here are the updates of my day:

  • Started a course on publishing today in order to brush up on my skills and hopefully help me get the book I've been working on for so long finally shipped off to a publisher! (more on this subject later)
  • Successfully eliminated 2,445 words from my manuscript. I still have yet to delete 2,857 words until I get down to my target 150,000. Though I'm worried that still may be far too many words. I guess we'll have to wait and see....
  • I found a list of publishers I think could be useful to people. Most have very strict guidelines, others are for lit-magazines only, and some have specific genres they dapple in. Still, I highly recommend scrolling through them all. Who knows? You might find something that clicks with you! (I've added this link to the Favorite Links List too at the bottom of this blog under the official name "30 Sci-Fi and Fantasy Publishers") 
  • Tomorrow is my dad's birthday which means I will not be posting or writing at all. This might actually be good for me because I've been going through my novel non-stop for the last few days the words are starting to blend together and read like jargon. Sometimes it's good to step away when this happens. I may even take a week or two off, even if this messes with my publication deadline even further. But at this point I'm now well over two months behind due to COVID, my editor dropping out on me, and other extenuating circumstances beyond my control. What's two more weeks, right? 
  • On that same note—and I am dead serious about this—I have a few jobs available to anyone who may be interested. They are as follows: 
    • Peer Reviewer: someone who will fully complete a peer trial-reading of my manuscript as is. There will be a small form to fill out along the way to provide feedback necessary for the novel's improvement and to ensure it is publication ready. Pay: $45*
    • Elimination Aid: someone who will help me eliminate unnecessary elements from my manuscript in the state it is currently in. Pay: $55**
    • Dual Position: someone who will act as both a peer reviewer AND an elimination aid, I will pay a slightly higher fee for this due to the nature of this job. Pay: $110*** 

      If you are interested in applying to any of the above, please comment down below with the following information:
    • Your Name
    • What you're applying for: Peer ReviewerElimination Aid, or the Dual Position
    • A letter regarding your credentials in addition to any past work you've done that's similar or the same as the above, and a brief discussion on why you think you would be a good fit for the position you're applying for
    • A list of 1-2 outside references, if you have them (this is not a necessity though it could prove beneficial) 
*To qualify, please note the review form must be completely filled out. If only half the form is filled out, you will be paid $22.50 so long as the answered aspects provide clear, concise and helpful information and exceed more than 10 words per answer when applicable. Anything less than half the form will not be seen as fit for completion and your performance as a peer reviewer will go unrecognized. This also applies to incidents such as if one worded answers are given throughout the entire form. Likewise Yes/No answers do not and will not count towards your performance and will be treated as unanswered responses  

**To qualify, please note > 850 words must be deleted, the manuscript must still be legible, characters stay as is, and the plot remains in tact. All deletions must be completed via GoogleDocs on a shared document using the "Suggestions" tool so that I can review all suggested deletions. If you cannot successfully delete the required 850 or more words you will still a receive a fee, but $5 dollars will be deducted from every 15 words that have fallen short of the minimum requirement (i.e. 835 words = $50). That being said, anything < 730 will result in a $15 gratuity fee no matter what, provided the number does not fall below triple digits. Should the number fall below triple digits your performance as an elimination aid will remain unrecognized 

***To qualify, please note > 950 words must be deleted, the manuscript must still be legible, characters stay as is, and the plot remains in tact. All deletions must be completed via GoogleDocs on a shared document using the "Suggestions" tool so that I can review all suggested deletions. If you cannot successfully delete the required 950 or more words you will still a receive a fee, but it will be reduced to $90 no matter what, provided the number does not fall below 500 deleted words. Otherwise your performance as an elimination aid will be unrecognized and you will simply be paid for your contribution as a peer reviewer but only so long as your performance of peer reviewer meets the criteria for completion/recognition

    • I will eventually post this offer to Upwork probably in the next 5-10 days, and I will share the link once that's been completed. That being said, I wanted to reach out to my readers first regarding this offer so you could all have the first chance to [re]view it, consider it, and hopefully grab it before this goes to someone else. So there you have it. If you have any questions or suggestions on the subject, either write to me in the comments below or email me. I look forward to hearing from you!
  • End of updates. Goodnight 😴

Accomplishment of the Day

I managed to knock out over eleven thousand unnecessary words from my manuscript, and I'm not even half-way through it, yet! Gods, do I love editing ❤ 🖊 📖