Despite the cons, I still wanted to go the self-publishing route for my first time around. Why? First: the horror stories. I have heard so many horror stories and done research turning into horror stories about authors signing on with a big house publisher, pouring their hard work, souls, and money into these companies only to have them go under and leave the author in sudden [often crushing] debt. Second: It's...well...rather easy. There's no rejection letters (although there probably should be - esp. in some cases), and there's no dealing with the hassles of negotiations, arguments over cover design, and let's face the other cons:
"Traditional Publishing Cons: Take six to eighteen months before publication. Price ebooks waaaaaay too high. They have power over cover art and title. Don’t use the marketing power they wield effectively. Pay royalties twice a year. Don’t involve you in many of the decisions regarding your book. Difficult to implement changes. Lousy royalty rates, between 6% and 25%. Very hard to break into" (Klems, "The Pros and Cons...")
Like Klems mentioned, unfortunately one of the cons in regards to getting self published is that it's damn near impossible to find an editor. A good editor. One who isn't a scam, or has the actual background/education, one who isn't $100/page (or sometimes even per word). It's really sucky. So I trained myself. I was going to be my own editor, everyone around me *who was willing* would contribute by being my pre-readers to give feedback very much workshop style. Yes, I was part of those too. And then when I felt like it was really ready I'd find someone, bite the bullet, and send them an editing request. After all, one of my greatest fears is that my work will turn into one of 'those books' that I mentioned at the beginning. If my book tanks, I want it to be because of my content, not because of my bad writing. Or lack of editing.
"Traditional Publishing Cons: Take six to eighteen months before publication. Price ebooks waaaaaay too high. They have power over cover art and title. Don’t use the marketing power they wield effectively. Pay royalties twice a year. Don’t involve you in many of the decisions regarding your book. Difficult to implement changes. Lousy royalty rates, between 6% and 25%. Very hard to break into" (Klems, "The Pros and Cons...")
Like Klems mentioned, unfortunately one of the cons in regards to getting self published is that it's damn near impossible to find an editor. A good editor. One who isn't a scam, or has the actual background/education, one who isn't $100/page (or sometimes even per word). It's really sucky. So I trained myself. I was going to be my own editor, everyone around me *who was willing* would contribute by being my pre-readers to give feedback very much workshop style. Yes, I was part of those too. And then when I felt like it was really ready I'd find someone, bite the bullet, and send them an editing request. After all, one of my greatest fears is that my work will turn into one of 'those books' that I mentioned at the beginning. If my book tanks, I want it to be because of my content, not because of my bad writing. Or lack of editing.
No comments:
Post a Comment